Umělec magazine 2001/3 >> Cloned Identity List of all editions.
Cloned Identity
Umělec magazine
Year 2001, 3
6,50 EUR
Send the printed edition:
Order subscription

Cloned Identity

Umělec magazine 2001/3


Vít Havránek | profile | en cs

"Those familiar with the Czech and Slovak art scenes may recognize the name Stano Filko. And very likely those same people would, without hesitation, and mostly based on his initial oeuvre, place him in the 1960s context – rightfully so. Few recall, however, what exactly it was that this artist did back then, and perhaps only a handful of Slovak art historians know what he`s been working on during the past ten years, since his return from exile in the United States (1983 – 1989). Nevertheless, Filko is now finding himself back in the spotlight of Slovak art.

At the end of the 1960s Filko was an emerging star — not only in Slovakia but also in the Czech lands. He gained recognition at prestigious European exhibitions such as Frank Popper’s Cinetisme, Spectacle, environment (Grénoble, 1968); he was invited to Documenta VII; he was mentioned in every important foreign review of contemporary Czechoslovak art at that time (Padrta, Popper, Restany) and in books by Frank Popper and Udo Kultermann, among others.
Despite this, the extent of Filko’s work is so little known that a condensed interpretation would be pointless. Instead, let’s now spend some time remembering a few of the areas he was
involved in.
In the 1950s and 1960s, Filko painted, made assemblages (so-called “accumulages” or “altars of reality”) and, together with Alex Mlynárčik and Zita Kostrová, invented the first Happsoc (1965) — a practically inexplicable action something like a happening, conceptual art, and a proclamation all rolled into one. His “altars of reality” combined various materials/objects, shards of mirror, photographs and daily objects. As time passed, the works were slowly added to and eventually expanded into whole environments. From 1966, Filko began including electronic media such as slide projection, radio and sound in the environments, bridging the gap between pure phenomena and information sources. Pierre Restany referred to him as an “architect of information.”
In 1967, at Gallery Karlovo Náměstí, Filko advanced to the role of spiritual action artist when he employed every artistic gesture in the canon, working with the entire gallery environment. At that time he was also collecting photographic material (found photographs taken from magazines, books and newspapers) that reflected his peculiar areas of interest, ultimately publishing it all in the crude series Associations. He also put out his own music, and the catalogue he published in 1970, Stano Filko, Oeuvre II, is in its own right a conceptually sophisticated project.
In the 1970s, his installations and actions shifted slightly, away from the social, political and sociological reality of the freer 1960s to values more emotional and spiritual in nature. Around that time written text began to play a more crucial role in his work (White Space in White Space, 1973-1977). The texts were not merely background or addition. In fact, they became an independent element that gradually developed into a new discipline called Text Art. They are notable for their deconstruction of standard orthography and for their characteristic syntax. Understanding the origins and specific features of Filko’s Text Art, as well as categorizing it within the context of conceptual language, would require a lengthy study. Filko focused on combining and harmonizing rationality, sensitivity and emotion, and then transformed the texts, allowing them to assume a greater homogeneity (see texts “Emotion, Clear Emotion, White Space in White Space,” 1977, and “Transcendence,” 1978).
His American works from the 1980s and 1990s pared down to a kind of modern primitivism, strengthening the symbolic and spiritual dimension of his work through the simplification of means, which further developed into a complicated personal iconography. In order to understand Filko’s installations from that time, it is important to notice the increasing number of texts that no longer relate to the individual projects. They represent a perpetually developing study dealing with numerous phenomena, and play a defining role in his iconography.
But the theme that most closely approaches Filko’s person/body is the construction of his own identity, the symbolic reconstruction of his own ego following each of his three self-declared clinical deaths (1945, 1952, 1984). He takes the experiment further by cloning his ego through various name mutations: Stano Filko (1937-1977), Stan Fylko (1978-1987), Stan Phylko (1988-1988/1989), Phylko (1988-1997), and Phys (1998-present). In addition to the theme of his personal identity, which dates all the way back to the 1960s (My Birthplace, 1968/1978), Filko also sought to unravel the motif of Woman/Venus/Shehrezad and the continuously recurring point of infinity/space/time cosmos.
Now he has once again begun to initiate new groups and projects, as he did in the 1960s and 1970s when he formed Filko-Mlynárčik, and Filko-Laky-Zavarský. One of his recent joint projects is a strong conceptual and visual partnership with the much younger artist Boris Ondreička.

Due to the nearly forty-year-long absence of any exchange between Slovakia and the rest of the European art scene, there is a distinct imbalance between the significance and originality of Filko’s works and the recognition they have achieved outside Slovakia, or even in his homeland. The generation that emerged in the 1960s was without a doubt the one that suffered most from this neglect.
The influence that political, cultural and social circumstances had on Filko’s work during different periods could form a chapter of its own. His mutually influential relationship with society was most striking in the second half of the 1960s, an exceptionally fruitful time for Filko, in which he created a number of actions/concepts Happsocs I.-IV.), big projects and environments, “project art” and “associations.” Although Filko has succeeded in realizing relatively imposing projects (the environments Universal, Cathedral of Humanism, Cosmos etc.), great potential lies latent in his list of unrealized projects, projects Filko considers to be finished works of art, or “project art,” in themselves. Since the end of the 1960s, he has been referring to them as a genre entitled “conceptual thought.” They are not utopian in the standard sense of the word. Project art was conceived of intentionally as art whose definite material existence remains open. Almost all of Filko’s projects can be realized, but the artist seems to have no desire to waste time and energy in their immediate realization.
At the beginning of the 1970s, Filko came under extreme political pressure and soon found that he could no longer work. Logically Filko should have continued to develop his “project art” as opposed to the realizations, and this was partly his approach. However, it seems that realizations represent a more integral part of the artistic life for Filko. Furthermore, the result of free choice is qualitatively different from action taken under overt ideological pressure: The potential for materialization is always open, and electing to leave a project in virtual form is a metaphysical and spiritual demonstration of personal independence from reality. It is a joyful, unrestrained selection as opposed to a position forged by external circumstance.
But it’s Filko’s approach to creation that is exceptional, the need to constantly add to a work, to interpret and include more in his current pieces or, on the other hand, not. For example, following the so-called “program” White Space in White Space, he inserted new perspectives into already finished projects, transforming a number of his works from the 1960s by either painting himself white or cutting out images of himself and the documentation of his actions. He works with his CV and life as if they were legends into which he is inserting symbolic notions — a process representing the a priori construction of his own ego.
A brief summary of his work reveals a conceptual nature particularly unaffected by dogma. Because of its scope, his crossover approach defies any simplistic understanding. Clearly this is what makes him so accessible to current thought, sensitivity and critical view. The Prague City Gallery is organizing a concise retrospective of Filko’s work for 2002 and will publish his first extensive catalogue in thirty years, which, with luck, will capture the range and originality of his realizations, concepts and projects. These days, Filko calls himself Phys, but the work on his past is far from finished. For Filko the past only exists as a field of interpretation and unfinished

Translated by Vladan Šír



There are currently no comments.

Add new comment

Recommended articles

Acts, Misdemeanors and the Thoughts of the Persian King Medimon Acts, Misdemeanors and the Thoughts of the Persian King Medimon
There is nothing that has not already been done in culture, squeezed or pulled inside out, blown to dust. Classical culture today is made by scum. Those working in the fine arts who make paintings are called artists. Otherwise in the backwaters and marshlands the rest of the artists are lost in search of new and ever surprising methods. They must be earthbound, casual, political, managerial,…
There’s 130 kilos of fat, muscles, brain & raw power on the Serbian contemporary art scene, all molded together into a 175-cm tall, 44-year-old body. It’s owner is known by a countless number of different names, including Bamboo, Mexican, Groom, Big Pain in the Ass, but most of all he’s known as MICROBE!… Hero of the losers, fighter for the rights of the dispossessed, folk artist, entertainer…
Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy
Goff & Rosenthal gallery, Berlin, November 18 - December 30, 2006 Society permanently renegotiates the definition of drugs and our relationship towards them. In his forty-five minute found-footage film The Conquest of Happiness, produced in 2005, Oliver Pietsch, a Berlin-based video artist, demonstrates which drugs society can accommodate, which it cannot, and how the story of the drugs can be…
Tunelling Culture II Tunelling Culture II
04.02.2020 10:17
Where to go next?
out - archeology
S.d.Ch, Solitaires and Periphery Culture (a generation born around 1970)
S.d.Ch, Solitaires and Periphery Culture (a generation born around 1970)
Josef Jindrák
Who is S.d.Ch? A person of many interests, active in various fields—literature, theater—known for his comics and collages in the art field. A poet and playwright foremost. A loner by nature and determination, his work doesn’t meet the current trends. He always puts forth personal enunciation, although its inner structure can get very complicated. It’s pleasant that he is a normal person and a…
out - poetry
THC Review and the Condemned Past
THC Review and the Condemned Past
Ivan Mečl
We are the fifth global party! Pítr Dragota and Viki Shock, Fragmenty geniality / Fragments of Charisma, May and June 1997. When Viki came to visit, it was only to show me some drawings and collages. It was only as an afterthought that he showed me the Czech samizdat publication from the late 1990s, THC Review. When he saw how it fascinated me, he panicked and insisted that THAT creation is…
To hen kai pán (Jindřich Chalupecký Prize Laureate 1998 Jiří Černický)
To hen kai pán (Jindřich Chalupecký Prize Laureate 1998 Jiří Černický)
birthing pains
Who’s Afraid of Motherhood?
Who’s Afraid of Motherhood?
Zuzana Štefková
Expanding the definition of “mother” is also a space for reducing pressure and for potential liberation.1 Carol Stabile The year was 2003, and in the deep forests of Lapák in the Kladno area, a woman in the later phase of pregnancy stopped along the path. As part of the “Artists in the Woods” exhibit, passers-by could catch a glimpse of her round belly, which she exposed especially for them in…
Books, video, editions and artworks that might interest you Go to e-shop
Limited edition of 10. Size 100 x 70 cm. Black print on durable white foil.
More info...
75 EUR
More info...
6,50 EUR
Getting down and into it, I hope to write for some time with no other objective than to entertain, let you know and otherwise...
More info...
More info...
55 EUR


Divus and its services

Studio Divus designs and develops your ideas for projects, presentations or entire PR packages using all sorts of visual means and media. We offer our clients complete solutions as well as all the individual steps along the way. In our work we bring together the most up-to-date and classic technologies, enabling us to produce a wide range of products. But we do more than just prints and digital projects, ad materials, posters, catalogues, books, the production of screen and space presentations in interiors or exteriors, digital work and image publication on the internet; we also produce digital films—including the editing, sound and 3-D effects—and we use this technology for web pages and for company presentations. We specialize in ...

Citation of the day. Publisher is not liable for any mental and physical states which may arise after reading the quote.

Enlightenment is always late.
CONTACTS AND VISITOR INFORMATION The entire editorial staff contacts

Kyjov 36-37, 407 47 Krásná Lípa
Čzech Republic


GALLERY, +420 222 264 830, +420 606 606 425
open from Wednesday to Sunday between 10am to 6pm
and on appointment.


CAFÉ & BOOKSHOP, +420 222 264 830, +420 606 606 425
open from Wednesday to Sunday between 10am to 10pm
and on appointment.


STUDO & PRINTING, +420 222 264 830, +420 602 269 888
open from Monday to Friday between 10am to 6pm


Ivan Mečl,, +420 602 269 888


Palo Fabuš,

Arch 8, Resolution Way, Deptford
London SE8 4NT, United Kingdom, +44 (0) 7526 902 082







Divus We Are Rising National Gallery For You! Go to Kyjov by Krásná Lípa no.37.